Self-Publishing, E-books, and Legitimacy: Fin
Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4.
Welcome to the final part of our weeklong discussion about self-published e-books and legitimacy. We’ve looked at different possibilities for attaining self-published e-book legitimacy and examined their pros and cons. We’ve heard several different perspectives from members in and outside of traditional publishing. It’s time to wrap things up and draw some needed conclusions.
The original concept that spurred this series was the idea of creating a “substantial publishing record” through self-published e-books, so that’s where I’d like to end. Sure, we’ve covered that building a large demonstrated readership (download numbers, reviews, etc), self-published or not, will probably get a traditional publisher’s attention. But what about legitimacy without transitioning to traditional publishing? Just what are we actually building here? A gateway to the big leagues? Or a separate and legitimate venue?
We’re trying to make the fringe mainstream – that’s the juicy beating heart of it. We’re punk music. We’re techie geeks. We’re social networking and blogging and twitter. We’re goddamn revolutionaries.
So this is how we do it: adoption and critical mass. Via flipping the bird at the establishment until the establishment is respectful or gone. Via not giving a damn about legitimacy.
Because we already have it.
E-book self-publishers need to take themselves seriously and keep plugging away at creating their own community. Don’t worry about the naysayers. They don’t matter.
The thing every author wants more than anything else is to be read. But it’s a two way street: we have to read, too. If we want our self-published e-books to be legitimate, we need to legitimize other self-published e-books by giving them our time and responses. There are some great sites out there that are already doing this, as well as other options, like blogs and twitter, for building a community.
So read each other’s work and review it on your site. If you don’t have a site, post about it on twitter, or facebook, or scribd, or wattpad, or bookoven, or however else you can get the word out. If you read something good, beat the digital pavement, signboard in hand. Trade reviews with people, but be honest about what’s quality and what isn’t. Build your name as a valued member of the community. Think of yourself as a professional and act like one, even if writing is only your hobby.
The only real way to give self-published e-books legitimacy is to make them legitimate ourselves. We need to write quality books, compose balanced reviews, and keep building our community.
Thank you very much for reading. Keep on keepin’ on,
-m.
P.S. To prove I’m not just a talker, if you send me a PDF of your quality self-published e-book, I’ll review it on my site. I know there are other writers who are willing to do this as well. Just remember, it’s a two way street, so help build your community and review someone.
Tags: blogs, community building, damn the man, ebooks, facebook, self-publishing, twitter




September 19th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Hi, I’m sorry I missed this – found you through Levi M.
I couldn’t agree more. There was a great article about punk publishing oevr on http://www.publetariat.com recently. The point is to do our thing and engage with our readers and set up a community alongside the mainstream – then watch their relative size change.
I think you’ve got your analysis SPOT ON. What we need is to be read. And free e-publishing is the wy to do that (I blogged on the importance of being read and the freemium debate over at http://loudpoet.com/2009/09/03/freemium-for-writers-is-two-debates/).
Can I ask you to get in touch. I run the Free-e-day festival (www.freeeday.wordpress.com) celebrating indie art, music, literature and film through free downloads, as well as offering practical help workshops and debates. I’d love to have you on board.
Very best
Dan
September 21st, 2009 at 11:52 am
Anytime I come across someone complaining about traditional publishing not being fair and skipping over so many good books, I try to track down examples of their writing. So far, I havn’t come across one single person on the self-publishing side of this debate who is good enough to be published traditionally.
See folks, there’s a reason you’re not getting an agent or getting that book deal. You’re just not good enough… Yet. Keep at it for another ten years, learn how to craft a scene and create tension and write dialog that doesn’t seem so plastic. In other words, work on the craft.
Sure there are books in the stores that you don’t like, but I read writing samples from people linked to in this post and what I saw was much worse. Just because you and your close friends think you’re great doesn’t mean you are.
If everyone could write and publish a novel, then everyone would have a novel. That right there is the problem with self-publishing. It takes zero talent to do it, so anyone who wants to can do it no matter how bad they are.
September 21st, 2009 at 1:31 pm
Sure. There is a lot of craptent out there. And some of it is mine. I mentioned in my first post of this series that I’m still learning. We’re all still learning. I’m also not trying to charge for my learning exploits – I give away my craptent for free.
But it’s not just about bad writing – it’s more than that. The face of publishing is changing – I just want to make sure it changes for the better.
October 4th, 2009 at 4:24 am
[...] here’s a series of essays on self-publishing that also generate some good [...]