<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Publishing, E-books, and Legitimacy: Fin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mispeled.net/2009/09/18/self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mispeled.net/2009/09/18/self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin</link>
	<description>Writing, Games, and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passing the Hat? &#171; Anthony Stevens&#8217; Weblog</title>
		<link>http://mispeled.net/2009/09/18/self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Passing the Hat? &#171; Anthony Stevens&#8217; Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mispeled.net/?p=252#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] here&#8217;s a series of essays on self-publishing that also generate some good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here&#8217;s a series of essays on self-publishing that also generate some good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mispeled</title>
		<link>http://mispeled.net/2009/09/18/self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>mispeled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mispeled.net/?p=252#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Sure. There is a lot of craptent out there. And some of it is mine. I mentioned in my first post of this series that I&#039;m still learning. We&#039;re all still learning. I&#039;m also not trying to charge for my learning exploits - I give away my craptent for free. 

But it&#039;s not just about bad writing - it&#039;s more than that. The face of publishing is changing - I just want to make sure it changes for the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. There is a lot of craptent out there. And some of it is mine. I mentioned in my first post of this series that I&#8217;m still learning. We&#8217;re all still learning. I&#8217;m also not trying to charge for my learning exploits &#8211; I give away my craptent for free. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not just about bad writing &#8211; it&#8217;s more than that. The face of publishing is changing &#8211; I just want to make sure it changes for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://mispeled.net/2009/09/18/self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mispeled.net/?p=252#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Anytime I come across someone complaining about traditional publishing not being fair and skipping over so many good books, I try to track down examples of their writing.  So far, I havn&#039;t come across one single person on the self-publishing side of this debate who is good enough to be published traditionally.  

See folks, there&#039;s a reason you&#039;re not getting an agent or getting that book deal.  You&#039;re just not good enough...  Yet.  Keep at it for another ten years, learn how to craft a scene and create tension and write dialog that doesn&#039;t seem so plastic.  In other words, work on the craft.  

Sure there are books in the stores that you don&#039;t like, but I read writing samples from people linked to in this post and what I saw was much worse.  Just because you and your close friends think you&#039;re great doesn&#039;t mean you are.

If everyone could write and publish a novel, then everyone would have a novel.  That right there is the problem with self-publishing.  It takes zero talent to do it, so anyone who wants to can do it no matter how bad they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime I come across someone complaining about traditional publishing not being fair and skipping over so many good books, I try to track down examples of their writing.  So far, I havn&#8217;t come across one single person on the self-publishing side of this debate who is good enough to be published traditionally.  </p>
<p>See folks, there&#8217;s a reason you&#8217;re not getting an agent or getting that book deal.  You&#8217;re just not good enough&#8230;  Yet.  Keep at it for another ten years, learn how to craft a scene and create tension and write dialog that doesn&#8217;t seem so plastic.  In other words, work on the craft.  </p>
<p>Sure there are books in the stores that you don&#8217;t like, but I read writing samples from people linked to in this post and what I saw was much worse.  Just because you and your close friends think you&#8217;re great doesn&#8217;t mean you are.</p>
<p>If everyone could write and publish a novel, then everyone would have a novel.  That right there is the problem with self-publishing.  It takes zero talent to do it, so anyone who wants to can do it no matter how bad they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Holloway</title>
		<link>http://mispeled.net/2009/09/18/self-publishing-e-books-and-legitimacy-fin/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Holloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mispeled.net/?p=252#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m sorry I missed this - found you through Levi M. 

I couldn&#039;t agree more. There was a great article about punk publishing oevr on www.publetariat.com recently. The point is to do our thing and engage with our readers and set up a community alongside the mainstream - then watch their relative size change.

I think you&#039;ve got your analysis SPOT ON. What we need is to be read. And free e-publishing is the wy to do that (I blogged on the importance of being read and the freemium debate over at http://loudpoet.com/2009/09/03/freemium-for-writers-is-two-debates/). 

Can I ask you to get in touch. I run the Free-e-day festival (www.freeeday.wordpress.com) celebrating indie art, music, literature and film through free downloads, as well as offering practical help workshops and debates. I&#039;d love to have you on board.

Very best

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m sorry I missed this &#8211; found you through Levi M. </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. There was a great article about punk publishing oevr on <a href="http://www.publetariat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.publetariat.com</a> recently. The point is to do our thing and engage with our readers and set up a community alongside the mainstream &#8211; then watch their relative size change.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve got your analysis SPOT ON. What we need is to be read. And free e-publishing is the wy to do that (I blogged on the importance of being read and the freemium debate over at <a href="http://loudpoet.com/2009/09/03/freemium-for-writers-is-two-debates/)" rel="nofollow">http://loudpoet.com/2009/09/03/freemium-for-writers-is-two-debates/)</a>. </p>
<p>Can I ask you to get in touch. I run the Free-e-day festival (www.freeeday.wordpress.com) celebrating indie art, music, literature and film through free downloads, as well as offering practical help workshops and debates. I&#8217;d love to have you on board.</p>
<p>Very best</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
